Free tools / Practice
Architecture Firm Health Scorecard
Score your practice against real industry benchmarks in about two minutes.
Why this exists. The benchmark data exists in paid industry reports. Nothing free lets a small firm owner see where they actually stand.
Everything here is calculated in your browser. Your numbers are never sent anywhere, stored or seen by us.
| Measure | You | Industry | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | 15.0% | avg 19.9%, strong 24% | 70 / 100 |
| Utilisation | 60.0% | 58.9% to 64% | 76 / 100 |
| Net multiplier | 2.80× | avg 3.1×, strong 3.3× | 66 / 100 |
| Overhead multiplier | 1.60× | avg 1.5× | 80 / 100 |
| Realisation | 85.0% | avg 83%, strong 90% | 79 / 100 |
| Days to get paid | 65 days | 49.4 to 73.2 days | 70 / 100 |
| Backlog | 5.0 months | about 7.6 months reported | 79 / 100 |
| Win rate | 30% | 45% median for architecture firms | 57 / 100 |
| Referral dependence | 80% | lower is more resilient | 63 / 100 |
Fix win rate first. It is the furthest below benchmark and usually the cheapest to move.
Benchmarks come from BQE architecture benchmarking and the Deltek Clarity annual A and E study. The two disagree on several measures because the samples differ, so ranges are shown rather than a single target.
How this is calculated
- Scores are relative to published benchmarks for architecture and engineering firms, which skew toward larger practices than a typical small studio. A sole practitioner should read the direction rather than the grade.
- Referral dependence is scored inversely. High referral share is not bad work, it is concentration risk, because you cannot schedule a referral.
This is a planning estimate, not professional advice. Read the full disclaimer.
A grade is only useful if something changes after it.
A free growth audit takes the weakest number here and works out what it would take to move it.
Talk to the founderThe thinking behind it